CUET Physics Question Paper Analysis 2025: Memory Based Questions, Difficulty Level

CUET 2025 Physics Question Paper Analysis: The CUET 2025 Physics paper is a vital part of the Common University Entrance Test (CUET), which facilitates admissions to undergraduate programs across central and participating universities in India. Physics is especially important for candidates aspiring to pursue courses in Engineering, Physical Sciences, Data Science, and Applied Physics. The CUET exam is scheduled to be held between May 13 and June 3, 2025. The exact date for the Physics paper is yet to be announced. Once the examination concludes, this article will be updated with a detailed Physics paper analysis, memory-based questions, and expert-verified solutions.

CUET 2025 Physics Paper Analysis

CUET 2025 Physics Test – 30th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• Paper was easy to moderate

• Students attempted around 35–40 questions on average

• Very few questions were asked from Modern Physics

• More questions were asked from Ray Optics

• Question was asked from Moving Charges and Magnetism

• 10–12 questions were direct formula-based

CUET 2025 Physics Test – 29th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The exam was difficult and calculative.

• The paper was tough and required calculations.

• Numerical-based and formula-heavy questions dominated the section.

• Students found the overall level challenging.

CUET 2025 Physics Test - 28th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• A graph-related question was asked

• Paper was easy to moderate

• From EPC, 5 to 6 questions were asked

• From MCM, 5 to 6 questions were asked

• No question about magnetism and matter

• No question from the microscope, telescope, and prism

• Semiconductor-based question came

CUET 2025 Physics Test - 27th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The paper was of easy to moderate level.

• Numerical questions were more conceptual in nature.

• Conceptual questions were asked from current electricity, modern physics, and wave optics.

• A question related to resistivity was asked from current electricity.

• A question was asked on cell combination.

• A question on threshold frequency was asked from modern physics.

• A question on the electric field and force due to a point charge was asked.

• Between questions 13–19, more questions were asked from modern physics.

• In some papers, ray optics had more weightage.

• The electrostatic potential section could be dominating in upcoming papers.

CUET 2025 Physics - 23 May (Shift 1) Analysis

• All questions were directly taken from or closely based on NCERT textbooks.

• Conceptual clarity was more important than numerical solving skills.

• The questions tested basic principles and theoretical understanding.

CUET 2025 Physics - 23 May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The difficulty level was easy, with a heavy focus on numerical questions.

• Most students attempted around 40-45 questions confidently.

• Several questions were statement-based, requiring concept clarity.

• Around 15 questions were full numericals, testing calculation skills.

• Approximately 135 questions were based on theoretical concepts.

• 6-7 questions came from the semiconductors chapter.

• All questions were largely NCERT-based, reinforcing the importance of the textbook.

CUET 2025 Physics- 22 May (Shift 1) Analysis

• Overall difficulty level was moderate, slightly higher than Chemistry.

• Questions required conceptual clarity; many involved application-based problem-solving.

• A few numericals were tricky and time-consuming.

• Some questions covered Electrostatics, Current Electricity, and Optics.

• A few assertion-reason type questions were included.

• Students attempted fewer questions here compared to Chemistry.

• Many felt time management was challenging due to conceptual depth.

CUET 2025 Physics – 21 May (Shift 1) Analysis

Difficulty Level: Easy to Moderate

• Around 8 to 12 questions were numerical and primarily formula-based.

• Several theory questions involved ratio-based or statement-based reasoning.

• A direct question from Electromagnetic Induction tested the EMF equation.

• Current Electricity questions included topics like equivalent resistance and current density.

• Capacitance-related questions focused on series/parallel ratios and basic definitions.

• Definitions and examples of potential energy were covered under Work, Energy & Power.

• Magnetism-related questions included the momentum of a magnet.

• Ray Optics had one conceptual question.

• One question directly addressed Maxwell’s fourth equation in the EM Waves topic.

CUET 2025 Physics 21 May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The Physics section featured a heavy emphasis on numericals, with nearly 18 to 20 calculation-based questions.

• While most numericals were direct and formula-driven, a few demanded deeper conceptual understanding.

• Topics like Magnetism, Electrostatics, and Semiconductors were highly represented.

• Some of the tougher problems involved magnetic force calculations among multiple current-carrying wires.

• A notable question asked students to analyze the force interactions when a third wire was placed between two parallel wires.

• Many candidates found the section lengthy, largely due to the time required for solving numericals.

Overall, the difficulty level leaned towards moderate to tough, especially for those not comfortable with numericals.

CUET 2025 Physics – 20 May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The overall difficulty level of the Physics paper was moderate to tough.

• Questions were largely conceptual and directly based on the NCERT textbook.

• Many questions required formula-based application in numerical problems.

• Frequently asked topics included Current Electricity, Electromagnetic Induction, and Thermodynamics.

• Other questions came from Gravitation, Capacitance, and Optics.

• A few questions were tricky and tested understanding of multiple concepts.

• The paper was reported as time-consuming, particularly for average-performing students.

CUET 2025 Physics– 19 May (Shift 1) Analysis

Overall Level: Moderate

• Paper consisted mostly of numerical questions.

• Very few questions were from Modern Physics.

• Numericals were easy to attempt and not lengthy.

• Questions were concept-based and calculative.

• Most students attempted 46–49 questions confidently.

CUET 2025 Physics — 16th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The overall paper was moderate in difficulty, with numericals dominating the section.

• Topics like Current Electricity, Modern Physics, Semiconductor, and Optics were frequently asked.

• Numerical questions tested concepts of Work, Power, Energy, and Laws of Motion.

• Assertion-Reason questions were conceptual and required careful interpretation.

• Direct formula-based questions were present but needed precise calculations.

• Some application-based questions were framed around real-life physics scenarios.

• Time management was essential due to the calculative nature of numericals.

CUET 2025 Physics -15th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The difficulty level was moderate to difficult.

• Many questions were directly taken from previous year question papers.

• The paper included a mix of numerical and theoretical questions.

• A significant number of questions were asked from Current Electricity (Book 1)

• Ray Optics was another frequently tested topic, with questions on Telescope and Microscope concepts.

CUET 2025 Physics -14th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• The CUET 2025 Physics paper was of moderate to difficult level, testing conceptual clarity and in-depth theoretical knowledge.

• On average, students were able to attempt around 37 questions with confidence, while some numericals were time-consuming.

• The paper was conceptual and theory-heavy, focusing more on understanding and application rather than simple formula-based questions.

• Memory-based questions covered important Physics topics, including:

  • Match the wavelength with its corresponding color in the visible spectrum.

  • 2 questions on Total Internal Reflection (TIR) and its applications.

  • 3–4 questions based on the de Broglie equation, testing understanding of wave-particle duality.

  • Identification of the diode used for converting AC to DC.

  • A real-life application question on Newton’s Laws of Motion.

  • Ray diagram problems involving concave and convex mirrors, testing image formation concepts.

CUET 2025 Physics - 13th May (Shift 1) Analysis

• The Physics paper had a 60% numerical to 40% theory ratio, which made it more calculation-heavy than usual.

• Topics like Atoms, Nuclear Physics, Optics, and Current Electricity were frequently asked, some with tricky numerical problems.

• The paper was rated as slightly tougher than expected, but not at the extreme NEET difficulty level.

• The conceptual understanding of formulas and their application was critical, as direct formula-based questions were limited.

• Some numericals were multi-step and time-consuming, demanding both speed and accuracy.

• Overall, it tested both basic theory knowledge and problem-solving ability under pressure.

CUET 2025 Physics - 13th May (Shift 2) Analysis

• Mechanics had conceptual questions on laws of motion and work-energy-power.

• Electrostatics and Current Electricity questions involved numericals and theoretical concepts.

• Optics covered ray diagrams and lens formula applications; moderate level.

• Modern Physics included questions on photoelectric effect and nuclear physics; factual based.

• Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer were tricky, involving formula application.

• Semiconductors and Communication Systems had direct theory questions.

• Overall, physics was moderate with a few time-consuming numericals.

Why CUET 2025 Physics Paper Analysis Matters

Analysing the CUET Physics paper is critical for students aiming to assess their performance and for future aspirants to streamline their preparation. Here's why it matters:

• Topic-Wise Focus: Identify the most frequently tested chapters

• Concept vs Formula-Based Mix: Gauge whether the emphasis was on deep understanding or quick recall

• Numerical Complexity: Understand the level of computation required in numerical questions

• Trend Analysis: Detect changes from previous years in topic importance or question formats

• Time Allocation Insights: Determine the ideal distribution of time across various question types

• Preparation Blueprint: Provide guidance to future candidates on topic prioritization and strategy